NR505NP Discussions Latest 2022 August (Full)

Question # 8 00637415
Subject: Health Care
Due on: 07/31/2022
Posted On: 07/31/2022 02:35 AM
Tutorials: 1
Rating:
4.9/5
Rapidanswer
Posted By :
Questions:
2026
Tutorials:
2017
Feedback Score:
Report this Question as Inappropriate
Question Dot Image

NR505NP Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice

Week 1 Discussion

Area of Interest in NP

Discussion Criteria

Application of Course Knowledge: The student's initial post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from the healthcare field. The student must accurately and fully discuss the topic for the week in addition to providing personal or professional examples. The student must completely answer the entire initial question. Initial post must be posted by Wednesday at 11:59pm MT. Two resources must be used in your initial post. One from the weekly reading or lesson and one outside source.

Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.

Peer Response: The student responds substantively to at least one topic-related post by a student peer. A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion.

A post of "I agree" with a repeat of the other student's post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.

The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.

The peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.

Integration of Evidence: The student post provides support from a minimum of one scholarly in-text citation with a matching reference AND assigned readings OR online lessons, per discussion topic per week. Two resources total and to count must be an in-text citation in your initial post.

What is a scholarly resource? A scholarly resource is one that comes from a professional, peer-reviewed publication (e.g., journals and government reports such as those from the FDA or CDC).

Contains references for sources cited

Written by a professional or scholar in the field and indicates credentials of the author(s)

Is no more than 5 years old for clinical or research article

What is not considered a scholarly resource?

Newspaper articles and layperson literature (e.g., Readers Digest, Healthy Life Magazine, Food, and Fitness)

Information from Wikipedia or any wiki

Textbooks

Website homepages

The weekly lesson

Articles in healthcare and nursing-oriented trade magazines, such as Nursing Made Incredibly Easy and RNMagazine (Source: What is a scholarly article.docx; Created 06/09 CK/CL Revised: 02/17/11, 09/02/11 nlh/clm)

Can the lesson for the week be used as a scholarly source?

Information from the weekly lesson can be cited in a posting; however, it is not to be the sole source used in the post.

Are resources provided from CU acceptable sources (e.g., the readings for the week)?

Not as a sole source within the post. The textbook and/or assigned (required) articles for the week can be used, but another outside source must be cited for full credit. Textbooks are not considered scholarly sources for the purpose of discussions.

Are websites acceptable as scholarly resources for discussions?

Yes, if they are documents or data cited from credible websites. Credible websites usually end in .gov or .edu; however, some .org sites that belong to professional associations (e.g., American Heart Association, National League for Nursing, American Diabetes Association) are also considered credible websites. Websites ending with .com are not to be used as scholarly resources

Professionalism in Communication: The post presents information in logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence, and is clearly relevant to the discussion topic. Grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate.

Wednesday Participation Requirement: The student provides a substantive response to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course faculty (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Total Participation Requirement: The student provides at least three substantive posts (one to the initial question or topic, one to a student peer, and one to a faculty question) on two different days during the week.

 

NR505NP Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice

Week 2 Discussion

Collaboration Cafe

The focus for Week 2 is the development of a PICOT question. Please view this short video on how to develop your PICOT question:

Using the area of interest identified in the Week 1 discussion, address the following:

Draft a PICOT question using the standard quantitative PICOT format.

Identify your practice question, being sure to include the following information and describe each part of the PICOT question in detail:

Population

Intervention

Comparison

Outcome

Time

In ________(Population) what is the effect of ___________(Intervention) in comparison to ___________ (Comparison) on _____________ (Outcome) to be completed over __________ (Time).

Review the PICOT questions of two of your peers. Provide substantive feedback and suggestions for improvement.

 

NR505NP Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice

Week 3 Discussion

Collaboration Cafe

With new information continually emerging, professional nurses must be equipped to critique scholarly literature and discern its value for practice. Select one current, quantitative scholarly nursing article related to your PICOT question and determine its strengths, limitations, and potential application.

Complete the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool  Download Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool. Once you’ve completed the tool, use your own words to summarize your appraisal of the article. Include the following:

Description of the purpose

Explanation of research design

Discussion of sample

Description of data collection methods

Summary of findings

Strengths of the study (minimum of 1)

Limitations of the study (minimum of 1)

Recommendations regarding potential application for future practice that are insightful and appropriate.

Attach the article to your post, in addition to including the full reference for the article in your post.

During the week, read a minimum of two articles posted by peers and add your thoughts about whether you feel their article would support an EBP change.

 The John Hopkins tool does not need to be turned in, it is a worksheet for you to decide what type of article you have.

 

NR505NP Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice

Week 4 Discussion

Collaboration Cafe

With new information continually emerging, professional nurses must be equipped to critique scholarly literature and discern its value for practice. 

Select one current, qualitative or mixed methods scholarly nursing article related to your PICOT question and determine its strengths, limitations, and potential application.

Complete the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool  Download Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool. Once you’ve completed the tool, use your own words to summarize your appraisal of the article. Include the following:

Description of the purpose

Explanation of research design

Discussion of sample

Description of data collection methods

Summary of findings

Strengths of the study (minimum of 1)

Limitations of the study (minimum of 1)

Recommendations regarding potential application for future practice that are insightful and appropriate.

Attach the article to your post, in addition to including the full reference for the article in your post.

During the week, read a minimum of two articles posted by peers and add your thoughts about whether you feel their article would support an EBP change.

The John Hopkins tool does not need to be turned in, it is a worksheet for you to decide what type of article you have.

 

 

NR505NP Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice

Week 6 Discussion

Overview

Respond to the following prompts:

How has learning about the history of research ethics impacted your view of biomedical research?

In looking at the studies you reviewed for your PICOT question, do you feel that today’s researchers adequately protect the rights of human subjects? If not, what additional measures do you recommend?

Requirements:

Discussion Criteria

Application of Course Knowledge: The student's initial post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from the healthcare field. The student must accurately and fully discuss the topic for the week in addition to providing personal or professional examples. The student must completely answer the entire initial question. Initial post due by Wednesday at 11:59pm MT. You must include two resources in your initial post: one from your lesson or weekly reading and one from an outside scholarly source.

Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.

Peer Response: The student responds substantively to at least one topic-related post by a student peer. A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion.

A post of "I agree" with a repeat of the other student's post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.

What is a scholarly resource? A scholarly resource is one that comes from a professional, peer-reviewed publication (e.g., journals and government reports such as those from the FDA or CDC).

Contains references for sources cited

Written by a professional or scholar in the field and indicates credentials of the author(s)

Is no more than 5 years old for clinical or research article

What is not considered a scholarly resource?

Newspaper articles and layperson literature (e.g., Readers Digest, Healthy Life Magazine, Food, and Fitness)

Information from Wikipedia or any wiki

Textbooks

Website homepages

The weekly lesson

Articles in healthcare and nursing-oriented trade magazines, such as Nursing Made Incredibly Easy and RNMagazine (Source: What is a scholarly article.docx; Created 06/09 CK/CL Revised: 02/17/11, 09/02/11 nlh/clm)

Can the lesson for the week be used as a scholarly source?

Information from the weekly lesson can be cited in a posting; however, it is not to be the sole source used in the post.

Are resources provided from CU acceptable sources (e.g., the readings for the week)?

Not as a sole source within the post. The textbook and/or assigned (required) articles for the week can be used, but another outside source must be cited for full credit. Textbooks are not considered scholarly sources for the purpose of discussions.

Are websites acceptable as scholarly resources for discussions?

Yes, if they are documents or data cited from credible websites. Credible websites usually end in .gov or .edu; however, some .org sites that belong to professional associations (e.g., American Heart Association, National League for Nursing, American Diabetes Association) are also considered credible websites. Websites ending with .com are not to be used as scholarly resources

Professionalism in Communication: The post presents information in logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence, and is clearly relevant to the discussion topic. Grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate.

Wednesday Participation Requirement: The student provides a substantive response to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course faculty (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Total Participation Requirement: The student provides at least three substantive posts (one to the initial question or topic, one to a student peer, and one to a faculty question) on two different days during the week.

 

NR505NP Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice

Week 8 Discussion

Peer Review

Purpose

The purpose of the graded collaborative peer review is to provide students with the opportunity to engage in the critique of peers' week 7 evidence-based projects. Scholarly information obtained from credible sources as well as professional communication are required. Meaningful dialogue among students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.

In week 8, you will record a Kaltura presentation based on the PowerPoint slide show created in week 7. You will interact with peers related to their presentations.Activity Learning Outcomes

Through this peer review discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

CO3: Demonstrate professional and personal growth through a spirit of inquiry, scholarship, and service in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 3, 4)

CO4: Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 5)

CO5: Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)

Requirements:

Initial post: Create a Kaltura video presentation based on the PowerPoint slideshow you submitted in week 7. The slides you created should be displayed on your screen in the recorded presentation; Use of the Kaltura camera feature is optional. A clear audio presentation of the content should be included. While the presentation is due Wednesday, please consider posting the presentation to the discussion area early in the week to facilitate a robust discussion.

Kaltura Resources: Use the Kaltura resources found under the Resources tab in the course. If you have difficulty using Kaltura Capture Space, reach out to IT first (please obtain a ticket number). If you are still unable to record using Kaltura, reach out to your instructor for alternate recording options.

Participating in the Discussion: View and provide feedback on a minimum of 2 peer presentations. You may address some of the following questions in your responses:

Is the PICOT question original, relevant, and interesting?

Is the presentation clear and easy to follow?

Did the presentation provide sufficient evidence to support the presenter’s recommendations?

Are references accurate, adequate, and balanced?

Does the presentation add to nursing knowledge?

What applications do you see for the content of this presentation to your practice as an NP?

Your peer posts should add to the dialogue or ask questions about the presentation.

Dot Image
Tutorials for this Question

NR505NP Discussions Latest 2022 August (Full)

Tutorial # 00636295
Posted On: 07/31/2022 02:37 AM
Feedback Score: Not rated yet!
Purchased By: 2
Rapidanswer
Posted By:
Questions:
2026
Tutorials:
2017
Feedback Score:
Report this Tutorial as Inappropriate
Tutorial Preview
The solution of NR505NP Discussions Latest 2022 August (Full)...
Attachments
NR505NP_Discussions_Latest_2022_August_(Full).zip (38.51 KB)

Great! We have found the solution of this question!

Related Questions
NR505NP Week 8 Discussion Latest 2022 August
NR505NP Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice Week 8 Discussion Peer Review Purpose The purpose of the graded collaborative peer review is to provide students with the opportu …
NR505NP Week 6 Discussion Latest 2022 August
NR505NP Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice Week 6 Discussion Overview Respond to the following prompts: How has learning about the history of research ethics impacted your …
NR505NP Week 4 Discussion Latest 2022 August
NR505NP Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice Week 4 Discussion Collaboration Cafe With new information continually emerging, professional nurses must be equipped to critique sch …
NR505NP Week 3 Discussion Latest 2022 August
NR505NP Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice Week 3 Discussion Collaboration Cafe With new information continually emerging, professional nurses must be equipped to critique sch …
NR505NP Week 2 Discussion Latest 2022 August
NR505NP Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice Week 2 Discussion Collaboration Cafe The focus for Week 2 is the development of a PICOT question. Please view this short video on ho …
NR505NP Week 1 Discussion Latest 2022 August
NR505NP Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice Week 1 Discussion Area of Interest in NP Discussion Criteria Application of Course Knowledge: The student's initial post cont …
NR505NP All Reflection on Learnings Latest 2022 August (Full)
NR505NP Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice Week 1 Reflection on Learning What experiences have you had with EBP or QI in your practice area? What factors in your practice area …
NR505NP Week 8 Reflection on Learning Latest 2022 August
NR505NP Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice Week 8 Reflection on Learning Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to provide the student an opportunity to reflect on the weekl …
NR505NP Week 7 Reflection on Learning Latest 2022 August
NR505NP Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice Week 7 Reflection on Learning In looking at the possible types of dissemination, which appeals to you most? Why? What steps could you …
NR505NP Week 6 Reflection on Learning Latest 2022 August
NR505NP Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice Week 6 Reflection on Learning In completing your CITI modules, was there anything that surprised you? What similarities did you see b …
Recent Questions
Ethics Memo - You are the HIM Director in an acute care hospital setting
Description Scenario: You are the HIM Director in an acute care hospital setting. Your facility has purchased an electronic health record (EHR) system, and pressure is mounting to deploy this syste …
Grantham HU260 All Quizzies Latest 2022 August
HU260 Strategies for Decision Making Week 1 Quiz    •             Question 1Words such as “because,” &ldquo …
Grantham HU260 Week 3 Midterm Exam Latest 2022 August
HU260 Strategies for Decision Making Week 3 Midterm Exam Question 1In your own words, explain the difference between validity and soundness. Question 2In your own words, construct a syllogism …
Grantham HU260 Week 8 Quiz Latest 2022 August
HU260 Strategies for Decision Making Week 8 Quiz    Question 1Which of the following is an example of old media? Question 2Which of the following is an example of new media? Ques …
Grantham HU260 Week 7 Quiz Latest 2022 August
HU260 Strategies for Decision Making Week 7 Quiz    Question 1Although the mass media are a modestly good source of breaking news, smaller-scale outlets are much better at analysis, at …
Grantham HU260 Week 6 Quiz Latest 2022 August
HU260 Strategies for Decision Making Week 6 Quiz    Question 1Loyalty and provincialism are related to prejudice. Question 2Loyalty inclines us to see our own society and its belief …
Grantham HU260 Week 5 Quiz Latest 2022 August
HU260 Strategies for Decision Making Week 5 Proctored Exam Question 1Even perfectly good statistics can be misused. Question 2Polls can be misleading because of Question 3Identify the fall …
Grantham HU260 Week 4 Quiz Latest 2022 August
HU260 Strategies for Decision Making Week 4 Quiz    •Question 1       Identify the fallacy: Misrepresenting someone’s position to make it easie …
Grantham HU260 Week 3 Quiz Latest 2022 August
HU260 Strategies for Decision Making Week 3 Quiz    Question 1This moral theory prioritizes the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Question 2This moral theory prioriti …
Grantham HU260 Week 2 Quiz Latest 2022 August
HU260 Strategies for Decision Making Week 2 Quiz    Question 1Affirming the consequent and denying the antecedent are examples of deductively invalid argument forms. Question 2An ar …
Loading...