Herzing NU636 All Units Discussions Latest 2019 JULY

Question # 00604070
Course Code : NU636
Subject: Education
Due on: 08/26/2019
Posted On: 08/26/2019 10:14 AM
Tutorials: 1
Rating:
4.9/5
Question Dot Image

NU636 Advanced Pharmacology

Unit 1 Discussion

Clinical consequences of Drug Binding

Instructions:

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Prompt

During the process of drug distribution a number of drugs are highly protein bound.

What does this indicate and what are the clinical consequences?

Peer Response: Unit 1, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT

Clinical consequences of Drug Binding

Instructions:

Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:

Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?

Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.

Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.

Present new references that support your opinions.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

NU636 Advanced Pharmacology

Unit 2 Discussion

Diabetic Hypertensive Complications

Instructions:

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Prompt

Diabetic hypertensive patients have a higher risk of developing complications with an increased mortality.

What are some of these complications and what is the ideal way to treat a diabetic hypertensive patient?

Peer Response: Unit 2, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT

Diabetic Hypertensive Complications

Instructions:

Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:

Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?

Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.

Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.

Present new references that support your opinions.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

Estimated time to complete: 1 hour

NU636 Advanced Pharmacology

Unit 3 Discussion

Beta Blockers

Instructions:

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Prompt

Beta blockers are considered to be an important inclusion in the regimen used to treat heart failure.

Discuss the role of the beta blockers in the treatment of heart failure and its mechanism of action.

Peer Response: Unit 3, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT

Beta Blockers

Instructions:

Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:

Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?

Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.

Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.

Present new references that support your opinions.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

Estimated time to complete: 1 hour

NU636 Advanced Pharmacology

Unit 4 Discussion

Use of Statins

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Prompt

Discuss the mechanism of action and clinical indications for the use of statins, considering age, ethnicity, and economic factors.

Peer Response: Unit 4, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT

Use of Statins

Instructions:

Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:

Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?

Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.

Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.

Present new references that support your opinions.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

NU636 Advanced Pharmacology

Unit 5 Discussion

Asthma and COPD

Instructions:

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Prompt

Bronchial hypersensitivity and asthma have several treatment approaches. Prophylactic therapy is also crucial in many patients.

Discuss the mechanisms of action of drugs used to treat asthma and COPD.

Peer Response: Unit 5, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT

Asthma and COPD

Instructions:

Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:

Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?

Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.

Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.

Present new references that support your opinions.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

NU636 Advanced Pharmacology

Unit 6 Discussion

Penicillin Hypersensitivity

Instructions:

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Prompt

Penicillin hypersensitivity limits your use of antimicrobials.

How are patients managed with penicillin hypersensitivity?

Identify the steps you would take to assist your patient?

Peer Response: Unit 6, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT

Penicillin Hypersensitivity

Instructions:

Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:

Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?

Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.

Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.

Present new references that support your opinions.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

NU636 Advanced Pharmacology

Unit 7 Discussion

Pregnant Patient

Pregnant Patient

Instructions:

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Prompt

A patient who is 14 weeks pregnant presents with symptoms of anxiety and also indicates that she has episodes of panic attacks.

Brainstorm the ideal treatment strategies used then discuss how to treat this patient pharmacologically?

How do these drugs work?

Peer Response: Unit 7, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT

Pregnant Patient

Instructions:

Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:

Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?

Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.

Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.

Present new references that support your opinions.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

NU636 Advanced Pharmacology

Unit 8 Discussion

Case Study on Anti-depressants

Estimated time to complete: 2 hours

Instructions:

Complete the unit 8 assignment in a word document

Copy and Paste it here as your response to this discussion

Also submit it in the Unit 8 Case Study drop box in the Submit Assignments/Assessments area

Since fluoxetine is the SSRI used in the case study, please respond to question 3 "

What are the side effects of fluoxetine?" with both side effects and potential adverse effects of excessive doses of SSRIs.

This unit 8 discussion post does not require any peer responses and must be submitted by Tuesday at 11:59 of week 8.

Dot Image
expertguy Posted By :
Questions: 34513 Tutorials: 33884
Tutorials for this Question

Herzing NU636 All Units Discussions Latest 2019 JULY

Tutorial # 00602759
Posted On: 08/26/2019 10:15 AM
Feedback Score: Not rated yet!
Purchased By: 2
expertguy
Posted By:
Questions:
34513
Tutorials:
33884
Report this Tutorial as Inappropriate
Tutorial Preview
The solution of Herzing NU636 All Units Discussions Latest 2019 JULY...

Great! We have found the solution of this question!

Related Questions
Herzing NU636 Full Course Latest 2019 JULY (No Quizzes)
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology Unit 1 Discussion Clinical consequences of Drug Binding Instructions: It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. R …
Herzing NU636 All Assignments Latest 2019 JULY
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology Unit 1 Assignment Case Study Polypharmacy Instructions Case Study Mrs. A is a 71 year old widow with CCF and osteoarthritis who has recently been exhibiting quite unu …
NU636 Full Course Latest 2020 August
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology Unit 1 Discussion Alternative Modalities In the Online Nursing Orientation resource module you were introduced to our graduate nursing certification success platf …
NU636 All Units Discussions Latest 2020 August
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology Unit 1 Discussion Alternative Modalities In the Online Nursing Orientation resource module you were introduced to our graduate nursing certification success platf …
Herzing NU636 All Units Discussions Latest 2019 JULY
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology Unit 1 Discussion Clinical consequences of Drug Binding Instructions: It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. R …
NU636 All Assignments Latest 2020 August
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology Unit 1 Assignment   Instructions Estimated time to complete: 2 hours Case Study Mrs. A is a 71 year old widow with CHF and osteoarthritis who has recent …
NU636 Unit 4 Discussion (dq1+dq2) Latest 2020 August
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology Unit 4 NU636, Pharmacology, Discussion DQ1 Diabetes Management Scenario: You are seeing a 64-year-old Hispanic male for his diabetes management.  He repor …
Herzing NU636 Unit 5 Assignment Case Study Acute Joint Inflammation Latest 2019 JULY
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology Unit 5 Assignment Case Study Acute Joint Inflammation Mr. Y is a 47 year old, mixed race [Asian/African ethnicity], male patient who presented to your office with sever …
Herzing NU636 Unit 8 Discussion Latest 2019 JULY
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology Unit 8 Discussion Case Study on Anti-depressants Estimated time to complete: 2 hours Instructions: Complete the unit 8 assignment in a word document Copy and Paste i …
Herzing NU636 Unit 1 Discussion Latest 2019 JULY
NU636 Advanced Pharmacology Unit 1 Discussion Clinical consequences of Drug Binding Instructions: It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. R …
Recent Questions
assignment help
Students may work alone or in groups of two to three or alone. Students may not work with classmates from another section; you must work within your section with the same clinical instructor.&nbs …
Is that worth to work with A1 All Tech Professional Services ?
A1 All Tech Professional Services is a trusted name in New Jersey for residential and commercial property improvement, offering expert craftsmanship in best general contracting company in Newark NJ, r …
regis college nu641 exam
any exam questions …
Walden HLTH6412 Complete Course Latest 2025
HLTH6412-1/HLTH8412E-1/HLTH5412 Health Ed & Comm. Strategies Module 1 Discussion EVIDENCE BASED RESOURCES You have probably heard of evidence-based medicine, but have you heard of evidenc …
Walden HLTH6412 All Assignments Latest 2025
HLTH6412-1/HLTH8412E-1/HLTH5412 Health Ed & Comm. Strategies Module 1 Assignment DISTINGUISHING RELIABLE SOURCES OF INFORMATION Ensuring that you utilize reliable health information to in …
Walden HLTH6412 Module 6 Assignment Latest 2025
HLTH6412 Health Ed & Comm. Strategies Module 6 Assignment FINAL PROJECT Each day the public is exposed to many different forms of health communication. Health communications and the healt …
Walden HLTH6412 Module 5 Assignment 3 Latest 2025
HLTH6412-1/HLTH8412E-1/HLTH5412 Health Ed & Comm. Strategies Module 5 Assignment 3 INFOGRAPHIC FOR HEALTH EDUCATION TO E-LEARNING Keeping in mind the knowledge you gained from completing …
Walden HLTH6412 Module 5 Assignment 2 Latest 2025
HLTH6412-1/HLTH8412E-1/HLTH5412 Health Ed & Comm. Strategies Module 5 Assignment 2 INTRODUCTION TO DATA STORYTELLING WITH INFOGRAPHIC This assignment explores how much an infographic can …
Walden HLTH6412 Module 5 Assignment 1 Latest 2025
HLTH6412-1/HLTH8412E-1/HLTH5412 Health Ed & Comm. Strategies Module 5 Assignment 1 USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HEALTH EDUCATION It may be difficult to believe that the term Artificia …
Walden HLTH6412 Module 3 Assignment 2 Latest 2025
HLTH6412-1/HLTH8412E-1/HLTH5412 Health Ed & Comm. Strategies Module 3 Assignment 2 ASSESSING CULTURAL COMPETENCE Being a culturally competent health educator can help reduce the health eq …