ENG105 English Composition
Week 1 Discussion
DQ1 Take a moment to reflect on past writing experiences from your academic, personal, or professional life. Answer the following questions as your initial post. Plan to have 150-200 words.
What was writing like for you as a child or young adult? Do you recall any vivid writing experiences?
How do you currently use writing in academic, personal, and professional experiences?
How might writing be used in future academic, personal, and professional experiences?
Respond to your peers’ reflections about their own writing experiences, finding similarities and differences and considering the role of writing in your life now and in the future.
DQ2 Read the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s page on ADHD; the link is provided below. Use the close reading techniques described in Chapter 1 of the e-book. It may be helpful to print off the page and annotate the text. Then, summarize the website in 150-250 words. Your summary should be similar to the example provded in Chapter 1 of the textbook.
Your summary should answer at least three of the questions below:
What key facts or details does the CDC share about ADHD?
In addition to the facts, what impression does the CDC create about ADHD? In other words, how does it make readers feel or what does it make readers think about ADHD?
What would motivate the CDC, which is a government institution, to post a page about ADHD?
Why, in your view, is the Web page a good or bad method for the CDC to distribute information?
How do you think the average reader would react to the CDC's page about ADHD?
(Hint: Do not try to summarize every detail. Focus on the main points the page is trying to convey. It is helpful to think of the CDC's page in terms of its sections, rather than its many facts.)
During the week, read and respond to your classmates’ summaries. Did you emphasize the same points in your summary that they did? Did you have the same impression about ADHD after you summarized it? Why or why not?
Link to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s page on ADHD:http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/facts.html
NOTE: If you click on the link and it will not open, paste the link into the browser.
DQ3 In the rhetorical analysis assignment, you will be expected to demonstrate an understanding that every text is created for a unique situation and audience. You will need to act on this by analyzing the decisions made by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on their website about ADHD. This includes the persuasive appeals the CDC uses.
Aristotle believed that speakers and writers used three kinds of persuasive appeals. Logos is an appeal to the audience’s powers of reason or logic. Pathos is an appeal to emotions or senses. Ethos is the personal appeal, charisma, or credibility of the speaker or writer. These three appeals are known as the rhetorical triangle because all three sides work together to make a text effective or not.
In your own words, explain the concepts of pathos, logos, and ethos and why they are important appeals to recognize in a text. Next, use the CDC's page about ADHD to analyze the ethos, logos, and pathos in the document.
Consider the following questions in your response:
What do you think about the logic presented in the document?
What do you think about its emotional appeal
What about its appeal to authority or credibility?
Does the CDC effectively present each of the rhetorical appeals? Why or why not?
Link to Centers of Disease Control’s website: http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/facts.html
ENG105 English Composition
Week 2 Discussion
DQ1 Look again at the CDC's Web page about ADHD.
In 150-200 words, please analyze the document’s purpose and audience. Who, for example, is the CDC's audience? What are the CDC's beliefs about ADHD, and how does the CDC's Web page relate itself to those beliefs? Why would the federal government post a Web page about ADHD? What role does the general public expect the government to play regarding disorders such as ADHD?
During the week, go back and read some of your classmates' posts. Do you agree with their views?
DQ2 Review the CDC website and answer at least three of the questions below:
Who is the writer?
What is the writer’s purpose?
Who is the intended audience?
What is the broader cultural context that motivated the writing of the article?
How does the writer establish ethos?
Does the writer appeal to logos (logic)?
Does the writer appeal to pathos (emotions)?
Do you feel that the website is effective? Why or why not?
Use these questions to guide the content of your rhetorical analysis.
During the week, review your classmates’ posts. What are some similarities and differences between your response and your peers’ responses?
ENG105 English Composition
Week 3 Discussion
DQ1 As the name implies, visual rhetoric means the part of communication that involves what is seen, including colors, forms, and the way what we are seeing is laid out on the page. Font type and size can also be included in visual design. The term rhetoric can sometimes cause confusion, so for clarity’s sake; here it means techniques used for the sake of persuasion.
Keeping these definitions in mind, describe an image from one of the CDC website pages on ADHD (http://www.cdc.gov/NCBDDD/adhd/index.html) that you find to be especially powerful and persuasive. What makes it so? Identify the image’s purpose and audience. Please be sure to provide a description of your chosen image so that your classmates and instructor can also analyze your selection.
During the week, read your classmates' posts and explain the degree to which you agree or disagree about the effectiveness of the visuals the CDC has provided on its page about ADHD.
DQ2 Writing an essay can be divided into at least three main parts—the introduction, the body, and the conclusion. Looking further into the essay, the thesis statement can be implicit (implied) or explicit (a line can be drawn under it).Depending upon the length of the essay, the introduction might be more than one paragraph, but the thesis statement should generally appear at the end of the introduction. Body paragraphs follow, and each has its own unique topic sentence, the first sentence that contains the unique supporting point for that paragraph. The conclusion needs a clear transitional word or phrase at the beginning (but not "In conclusion"), and it revisits the thesis and each main point. However, no new information belongs in the conclusion.
Please review the following video Writing Process about writing introduction paragraphs.
For the first essay, you wrote a rhetorical analysis of a public document. Please share your thesis statement for your rhetorical analysis essay. During the week, respond to your classmates with constructive feedback about their thesis statements.
DQ3 Use the following checklist to help make final revisions on your essay:
Are the introduction, body, and conclusion clearly defined?
Does the introduction provide sufficient background for the reader?
Is there a thesis statement that makes the main ideas of the essay clear?
Does every paragraph address the subject matter of the thesis in some way?
Does the essay show that the writer has a knowledge of the audience?
Is there credible support, specific examples, detail to make your points clearly?
Is the tone and voice formal enough for an academic essay?
Have all requirements of the assignment been met?
Are all sources credible?
Have all quoted, paraphrased, and summarized material been cited in-text with a corresponding reference on the reference page?
Is the grammar and punctuation correct?
Has the writer spell checked the essay?
Is the title capitalized correctly?
Are the correct margin and font and other requirements of GCU style correct?
Share with your peers the areas of strength in your essay discovered during this process. What aspects of your essay need improvement?
ENG105 English Composition
Week 4 Discussion
DQ1 Your next major assignment is the review essay. For this assignment, you will need to select a website related to ADHD/ADD and then compare the site to a set of criteria.
View the tutorial on the GCU Library website titled "Evaluating Websites." Take notes about the five criteria while you are watching it.
Which three of the five criteria do you find to be the most important? Do they seem like enough to evaluate a website? How would you define each criterion? Why is each one important?
During the week, review your classmates’ posts and discuss similarities and differences between your response and your peers’ responses.
DQ2 Which website did you choose to evaluate for your essay assignment? Please provide the URL of the website and the name. Post a message in which you describe your web site (at least one paragraph), and then offer some analysis of the website and how it meets the criteria (at least one more paragraph).
Which of the criteria you learned about earlier will you apply to the website and why? Do you feel your website matches up to the criteria, and does it appear to be an effective and valuable website? Use details and examples from the website to support your answer.
During the week, review your classmates’ posts and discuss similarities and differences between your response and your peers’ responses.
ENG105 English Composition
Week 5 Discussion
DQ1 Go back to your readings in Chapter 4 of the text on bias. Reread the information to help you answer this question.
Remember that bias can be found on a website.
View the website noted here: https://www.naturalchild.org/articles/guest/john_breeding.html.
What indications do you have that the site is biased or not biased? List three things that appear to make this site biased or unbiased. Finally, based on the criteria you have been learning about websites, do you believe this site is true and honest, or does it have an agenda? How might you address bias in your evaluation essay?
During the week, go back and review your classmates’ posts and discuss similarities and differences between your response and your peers’ responses?
DQ2 One way to disagree with a review is to question the expectations, or criteria, that an author has for the subject of his or her review. Describe how well the website you have chosen for your evaluation essay meets your expectations/criteria.
During the week, review your classmates’ posts and discuss similarities and differences between your response and your peers’ responses.
DQ3 Provide a sample in-text citation that you plan to use in your evaluation essay you are currently writing. Use one of the head/body/tail combinations from our textbook (Chapter 2). Then create a second citation for the same source, but use a different head/body/tail combination. As the week progresses, comment on your class mates' in-text citations. Do you think they were cited correctly? Why or why not? How do different patterns create different impressions about the source?
During the week, go back and review your classmates’ posts and discuss similarities and differences between your response and your peers’ responses?
ENG105 English Composition
Week 6 Discussion
DQ1 Do some research to identify a trend, event, or a policy related to ADHD. If you look on news websites, you can identify and discuss what reporters are currently writing about ADHD. If you look at the policy statements by institutions such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/facts.html) or American Psychological Association (APA.org), you can identify and discuss which policies or advice they provide. You could also try finding events (either past events or future ones) about ADHD at the local, state, or national level and then explain what one or more events were (or will be) about. Then, summarize your findings and report them to the class by responding to this discussion question.
During the week, go back and review your classmates’ posts and discuss similarities and differences between your response and your peers’ responses.
DQ2 What are some of the causes or consequences related to the trend you identified earlier this week? (Or, if you posted something about a policy or event, what do you see as the causes or consequences of those?) Who (or what) do you think is responsible for the problem, or who (or what) deserves credit for solving some part of the problem?
During the week, review your classmates’ posts and discuss similarities and differences between your response and your peers’ responses.
ENG105 English Composition
Week 7 Discussion
DQ1 According to strategies discussed in Chapter 4 of the textbook, post a message in which you explain the techniques you will use for your introductory paragraph and why they might be effective for you. Then write or revise your introductory paragraph using the techniques you have chosen. Post your introduction along with your explanation.
During the week, respond to others’ introductions and explain what you think they did well. Also, offer some advice for revision. You may also offer counterarguments by explaining how someone might disagree with their view.
DQ2 It is important to distinguish between your perspective and other perspectives regarding your commentary topic. What are some of the other perspectives you see? Summarize them briefly. Next, summarize your own perspective. In what ways does your perspective differ from other perspectives? Why is your perspective different?
ENG105 English Composition
Week 2 Assignment
Draft of a Rhetorical Analysis of a Public Document Assignment
Goal
Write a 750-1,000-word essay that analyzes the rhetorical situation of a public document. This public document is the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) website on Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) found at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/facts.html. Your analysis should include at least TWO scholarly sources outside of class texts.
Directions
Complete a close reading of the assigned public document. Then, write a cohesive essay that:
1. Introduces and summarizes the CDC website on ADHD.
2. Analyzes the rhetorical tools used on the site (here, you will want to incorporate ideas from your preanalysis below). For instance, your essay could analyze the CDC’s use of ethos, pathos, and logos.
3. Evaluates the site’s effectiveness (again, ideas from your preanalysis below will be helpful).
This essay is NOT simply an expository or descriptive essay or an analysis of ADHD. It is an analysis of the site and how effectively the site uses rhetorical tools to get its point across.
First Draft Grading
• You will receive completion points for the first draft based upon the successful submission of your draft.
• Because your first draft is a completion grade, do not assume that this grade reflects or predicts the final grade. If you do not consider your instructor’s comments, you may be deducted points on your final draft.
Final Draft Grading
The essay will be graded using a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations.
Sources
• Include in-text citations and a References page in GCU Style for at least TWO scholarly sources outside of class texts.
• These sources should be used to support any claims you make and should be present in the text of the essay.
• Use the GCU Library to help you find sources.
• Include this research in the paper in a scholarly manner.
Format
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
LopesWrite
• You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
• Please be sure to review your LopesWrite score before submitting the draft to your instructor.
Preparing to Write the Essay
Read the site closely:
1. Read the webpage on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) found at http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/facts.html
o Do a first reading that uses underlining, annotation, and summary to make sure you understand what the writer is saying. Go back to any sections that need clarification.
o On a second reading, pay attention to what the writer(s) of the CDC site is doing by describing the writer’s strategy.
Conduct a preanalysis:
1. Use your close reading to analyze the rhetorical situation of the site.
2. Here are some questions to guide your analysis.
3. You do NOT need to answer all of them—pick three that make the most sense to you. Your close reading will help you generate ideas for your essay.
• What is the context of the issue(s)?
a) What do you know about the topic?
b) What issues does the topic raise?
c) Is there a larger debate, discussion, or controversy already going on?
d) What seems to be at stake?
• Who is the writer?
a. What do you know about the writer’s background, credibility, knowledge of the topic, beliefs, and social allegiances?
• What is the publication?
a. What do you know about its intended readers, reputability, political slant, and the topics it covers?
• How does the writer define the rhetorical situation and identify the call to write?
a. What is the writer’s orientation toward the issues involved?
b. What is at stake for the writer?
• Who is the intended audience?
a. Is the writer addressing one group or more than one group of readers?
b. Is the writer trying to bring an audience into being?
c. What kind of relationship is the writer trying to establish with readers?
d. What assumptions about readers does the writer seem to make?
• How does the writer use language?
a. How does the writer use ethos, pathos, and logos to appeal to the audience?
b. What is the writer’s tone?
c. What does the writer’s word choice show about his or her assumptions about readers?
d. Does the writer use specialized terms or slang?
e. Are there memorable figures of speech?
f. Does the writer stereotype?
• What is your evaluation of the rhetorical effectiveness?
a. Does the writer accomplish his or her purposes?
b. What constraints, if any, qualify the writing’s effectiveness?
Draft the essay:
Once you’ve completed the pre-analysis, draft the essay. The essay should include:
1. Header, essay title, heading in GCU Style
2. An introduction paragraph with a thesis statement
3. At least three body paragraphs
4. A conclusion paragraph
Also, you will need to include a References page and in-text citations formatted in GCU Style with at least TWO scholarly sources outside of class texts.
Submit this assignment to your instructor in the assignment drop box AND post this draft as an attachment in the Module 2 Rhetorical Analysis Peer Review forum
ENG105 English Composition
Week 3 Assignment
Benchmark - Rhetorical Analysis of a Public Document Final Draft
Revise the draft you have written, utilizing the feedback from your peer review. Complete your revision in conjunction with the guidelines for the first draft assignment given in Topic 2.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with expectations for successful completion.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Please be sure to review your LopesWrite score before submitting the draft to your instructor.
ENG105 English Composition
Week 4 Assignment
First Draft of a Review Assignment
Write a 750-1,000 word review of a website about ADD or ADHD. You will write this review for the general public, so you might target a particular publication, such as a student or local newspaper or one of the national magazines. This will help you anticipate what your readers already know, what they value, and what criteria they accept as a basis of evaluation. Complete the following:
1. Develop a set of criteria that the general public would see as acceptable for a website about diseases and disorders (like ADHD).
2. Describe the website you have chosen, and then explain how it does (or does not) perform the criteria you established above.
3. Use at least two scholarly sources outside of class texts to augment your understanding and perspective on these facts and elements. Use the GCU library for sources. Include this research in the paper in an appropriate scholarly manner.
Prepare this assignment according to the GCU guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Please be sure to review your LopesWrite score before submitting the draft to your instructor.
The final draft of this assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
You will receive completion points for the first draft based upon the successful submission of your draft. The points are not an evaluative statement about your draft; be sure to consider all instructor comments as you revise your draft.
In addition to submitting this draft to your instructor, you must also post this draft as an attachment in the Week 4 Peer Review forum by Day 3 of Week 4.
ENG105 English Composition
Week 5 Assignment
Review Writing Assignment Final Draft
Revise the draft you have written utilizing the feedback from your peer review. Complete your revision in conjunction with the guidelines for the first draft assignment given in Topic 4.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Please be sure to review your LopesWrite score before submitting the draft to your instructor.
ENG105 English Composition
Week 6 Assignment
First Draft of a Commentary
ENG-105: Topic 6
First Draft of a Commentary Assignment
For this assignment, write a 750-1,000-word commentary that addresses a trend/topic related to ADHD.
This means that your essay should review a single trend related to ADHD. For instance, you could analyze one of the following trends (you are not limited to this list; these are suggestions):
• Increase in ADHD Diagnoses
• Impact of ADHD on a Child’s Schooling
• Impact of New ADHD Treatments
• Hidden Dangers of ADHD Medications
• The Reasoning Behind ADHD Awareness Week
• ADHD and the Zombie Phenomenon
• ADHD Drug Overdoses
This essay is NOT a summary of several different elements of ADHD. Rather, it is an analysis of a single trend related to ADHD, including various elements of that single trend.
Your review should include at least five scholarly sources outside of class texts.
Directions
1. Label or Identify the Subject: Provide the name for the trend and provide some context or background for the subject.
2. Explain the Subject: Find a pattern of meaning in the trend (e.g., speculate as to causes and effects of an event, compare with a similar case, or offer an example).
3. Make a Judgment/Offer an Opinion: Evaluate the trend using third person; offer praise or critique the trend, offering evidence to support your claims.
First Draft Grading
You will receive completion points for the first draft based upon the successful submission of your draft. Since instructor feedback for this draft is optional, you will need to consider feedback from peers and your self-review. You may also use the Center for Learning Advancement (CLA) and ThinkingStorm online tutoring services available at the following link for additional feedback: http://www.gcu.edu/Learning-Resources/Center-for-Learning-and-Advancement.php
The final draft of this assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Because your first draft is a completion grade, do not assume that this grade reflects or predicts the final grade.
Final Draft Grading
The final essay will be graded using a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations.
Sources
• Include in-text citations and a References page in GCU Style for at least FIVE scholarly sources outside of class texts.
• These sources should be used to support any claims you make.
• Use the GCU Library to help you find sources.
• Include this research in the paper in a scholarly manner.
Format
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
LopesWrite
• You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
• Please be sure to review your LopesWrite score before submitting the draft to your instructor.
Submit this assignment to your instructor in the assignment drop box AND post this draft as an attachment in the Topic 6 Commentary Peer Review Forum by Day 3 of Week 6.
ENG105 English Composition
Week 7 Assignment
Commentary Writing Assignment Final Draft
Revise the draft you have written, utilizing the feedback from your peer review. Complete your revision in conjunction with the guidelines for the first draft assignment given in Topic 6.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Please be sure to review your LopesWrite score before submitting the draft to your instructor.
ENG105 English Composition
Week 7 Assignment
Self-Review Assignment
Please open the attached document to obtain your Writing Self-Review Assignment.
You need to write your short responses on the document, save, and upload this document to the assignment drop box.
GCU style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
You are not required to submit this assignment to TurnItIn.
Submit this assignment to your instructor, in the assignment drop box, by Day 7 of Week 7.
Commentary Essay Topic:
Commentary Essay Thesis Statement:
Please write a minimum of 100 words for each of the three questions below, describing the progress you have made in your writing. Make sure you proofread your self-review before submitting.
1. What changes or improvements did you make to your commentary essay rough draft? Identify specific parts of your paper that you revised. Why did you make these changes to your rough draft? (100 words minimum)
2. How did a suggested revision from a peer, tutor, or anyone else help strengthen your paper? If you chose not to incorporate feedback into your essay, explain why. If, for some reason, you did not receive feedback from someone else, why is feedback from others a necessary step in the writing process? (100 words minimum)
3. What progress do you believe you have made as a writer during the course? In what areas do you still need to grow as a writer? Consider the following areas, created by the Council of Writing Program Administrators (2008), as you answer this question: (1) rhetorical knowledge like purpose, tone, and audience, (2) critical thinking, reading, and writing, (3) writing processes like drafting and revising, (4) knowledge of writing conventions like grammar and formatting, and (5) composing writing in electronic environments like LoudCloud or Microsoft Word. (100 words minimum)
Reference
Writing Program Administrators. (2008). WPA outcomes statement for first-year composition. Retrieved from http://wpacouncil.org/positions/outcomes.html
ENG105 English Composition
Week 1 Quiz Part1
Quiz Details
This quiz covers material that is critical to your success in ENG-105. As you take the quiz, please write down vocabulary and concepts that seem unfamiliar. You will have a chance to refresh your understanding of all the information on this quiz throughout our first week of class. Please do not hesitate to ask about study materials for any information you need.
The quiz will be in two parts; part one will be responding to the questions below, and part two will be a multiple choice section; you will be completing this section in the quiz forum (Go to the Task tab>>Quiz).
Part One Instruction:
Please answer the following five questions on this document; if you require more room to respond to the question, the space can be manipulated. Please remember to save your work and then submit this document in the assignment drop box for Module 1 Quiz: Part One. If you are unclear of these instructions, please contact your instructor.
1. Clark Kent is writing an essay for Professor Thunder Lope’s ENG-105 course and asks you to guide him in writing his heading in GCU Style for a paper that is due February 1, 2015. In the space below, please write the heading for this paper in GCU Style.
2. Sally Student has been asked to summarize a passage from her PHI-105 textbook. In your own words, what is a summary? (Your response should be between 25-50 words please.)
3. Summarize the following passage in 25-50 words:
From Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”:
“In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self purification; and direct action. We have gone through all these steps in Birmingham. There can be no gainsaying the fact that racial injustice engulfs this community. Birmingham is probably the most thoroughly segregated city in the United States. Its ugly record of brutality is widely known. Negroes have experienced grossly unjust treatment in the courts. There have been more unsolved bombings of Negro homes and churches in Birmingham than in any other city in the nation. These are the hard, brutal facts of the case. On the basis of these conditions, Negro leaders sought to negotiate with the city fathers. But the latter consistently refused to engage in good faith negotiation” (King, 1963, para. 6).
4. Write a paragraph interpreting the meaning of the passage taken from Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”: (Your response should be at least 100 words in length please.)
5. Based on the guidelines for the first essay assignment and the assigned readings for this week, what is a rhetorical analysis? What does it mean to analyze a text? (Your response should be between 50-100 words please.)
ENG105 English Composition
Week 1 Quiz Part2
•According to GCU Style, the heading, not the header, of an academic essay should be located:
•In the upper right corner on all pages.
•In the upper left corner of the first page only.
•In the bottom left corner of the first page only.
•On a separate title page.
•Unless an assignment specifically asks you to discuss your own personal views and experiences, please avoid the use of the ____ person in GCU essays.
•First
•Second
•Third
•Where should the thesis statement typically be located in an academic essay?
•The body of the paper.
•The last sentence of the essay.
•The last sentence of the introductory paragraph.
•Essays should not include thesis statements.
•According to GCU Style, all essays should be ___________ spaced.
•Triple
•1.5
•Double
•Single
•According to the GCU Style Guide, all sources listed on your reference page must have a corresponding in-text citation and vice versa.
•TRUE
•FALSE
•The rhetorical appeals: ethos, pathos, and logos persuade the audience by appealing to:
•credibility, emotion, logic.
•individuality, creativity, objectivity.
•children, thoughts, dogs.
•accuracy, objectivity, currency.
• For a direct quote’s in-text citation, either the page number (for a journal or book source) or the paragraph number (for a website source) is required.
•True
•False
